PAH Mortality Rates Comparable With ERA or PDE5 Inhibitor Therapy

This article originally appeared here.
Share this content:
According to the researchers, this is the first study to demonstrate that age modifies response to different types of PAH therapy.
According to the researchers, this is the first study to demonstrate that age modifies response to different types of PAH therapy.

There was no difference in long-term survival in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) initially treated with endothelin receptor blocker (ERA) monotherapy compared with phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor monotherapy, according to a study published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. However, age was an important modifier, with ERA monotherapy associated with lower mortality in younger patients compared with PDE5 inhibitor monotherapy, while the opposite was true in older patients. 

Gustavo A. Heresi, MD, MS, of the Department of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory Institute at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio, and colleagues, conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients with PAH initially treated with either an ERA or a PDE5 inhibitor. Patients who received a second agent within 8 weeks were excluded from the study. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome.

A total of 237 patients were included in the study; 91 received an ERA (bosentan, ambrisentan, or macitentan) and 146 received a PDE5 inhibitor (sildenafil or tadalafil). At the end of the follow-up period, 48.4% of patients who received ERAs were on monotherapy, while 35.2% were on double therapy, 15.4% were on triple therapy, and 9.9% were on parenteral prostacyclin. In the PDE5 inhibitor group, 54.1% were on monotherapy, 29.5% were on double therapy, 12.3% were on triple therapy, and 7.5% were on parenteral prostacyclin. Patients were followed for a median of 1304 days.

In the ERA group, there were 48 deaths (52.7%) and in the PDE5 inhibitor group there were 71 deaths (48.6%). No difference was noted in time to clinical worsening (death, lung transplantation, or PAH hospitalization) between the 2 groups. In younger patients, mortality was lower in patients treated with an ERA. The difference was most pronounced in white women younger than 45 taking an ERA, in whom the hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.43 (P =.03), while in women older than 65 the HR for death was 1.80 (P =.02).

The investigators noted that this is the first study to demonstrate that age modifies the response to different types of PAH therapy. They also noted that early treatment with an ERA or PDE5 inhibitor leads to differences in long-term mortality, particularly in younger patients.

The researchers suggested that these data offer support for a more targeted approach to PAH therapy, but cautioned that more studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of this strategy.

Reference

Heresi GA, Love TE, Tonelli AR, Highland KB, Dweik RA. Choice of initial oral therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension, age and long term survival [published online June 27, 2018]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med.  doi:10.1164/rccm.201801-0059LE

You must be a registered member of The Cardiology Advisor to post a comment.

Sign Up for Free e-Newsletters