Imaging
Central Line/Vascular Access Placement
- Preliminary Diagnosis: Central line vascular access placement
-
I. What imaging technique is first-line for this diagnosis?
- II. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of this technique for assessing the proper placement of central lines.
-
III. What are the contraindications for the first-line imaging technique?
-
IV. What alternative imaging techniques are available?
- V. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative techniques for assessing the proper placement of central lines.
- VI. What are the contraindications for the alternative imaging techniques?
Preliminary Diagnosis: Central line vascular access placement
I. What imaging technique is first-line for this diagnosis?
AP and lateral chest radiograph.
II. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of this technique for assessing the proper placement of central lines.
Advantages
Can demonstrate relatively accurately the position of the central line.
Inexpensive.
Can be performed quickly.
Can be obtained at the bedside.
Can screen for malpositioning as well as pneumothorax or hemothorax.
Disadvantages
Minimal ionizing radiation exposure.
May have difficulty distinguishing between catheter tip placement in the ascending aorta versus that in the superior vena cava.
III. What are the contraindications for the first-line imaging technique?
Some institutions may require consent be obtained if the patient is pregnant, in which case appropriate shielding should be performed.
IV. What alternative imaging techniques are available?
Fluoroscopy with IV contrast injected through the central line.
V. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the alternative techniques for assessing the proper placement of central lines.
Fluoroscopy with IV contrast injected through central line
Advantages
Definitively diagnostic.
Can determine if the central line is intact and patent.
Can detect the presence of a fibrin sheath or thrombus.
Disadvantages
Requires the use of iodinated contrast.
Requires a fluoroscopy suite and radiologist to perform.
Despite being performed quickly, may use relatively high dose of radiation.
VI. What are the contraindications for the alternative imaging techniques?
Fluoroscopy with IV contrast injected through central line
Pregnancy.
Creatinine >1.6.
Contrast allergy.
Copyright © 2017, 2014 Decision Support in Medicine, LLC. All rights reserved.
No sponsor or advertiser has participated in, approved or paid for the content provided by Decision Support in Medicine LLC. The Licensed Content is the property of and copyrighted by DSM.
The Cardiology Advisor Articles
- Statins in Patients Older Than 75: A Meta-Analysis of 28 Controlled Trials
- Infection and Infarction: Cause and Effect?
- Open Surgical Repair of Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms Linked to Early Postoperative Mortality
- Emergency Department Barthel Index Score Predicts Heart Failure Mortality
- Reversal Agent Reduces Severe Bleeding With Factor Xa Inhibitors
- Societies Release Updated Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation
- FDA: Unauthorized INR Test Strips Part of Large Recall
- Does Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Prevent Early Coronary Bypass Graft Occlusion?
- Banding Together: How Some Physicians Are Fighting the MOC Program
- Swan-Ganz Thermodilution Catheters Recalled Due to Lumen Reversal
- Machine Learning Algorithm May Guide Therapy in Adult Congenital Heart Disease
- Linagliptin Non-Inferior to Glimepiride in Long-Term CV Outcome Study
- No Association Between LDL Cholesterol Levels and Risk for Sepsis
- PAH Therapy Guidelines Updated by CHEST Expert Panel
- Protecting Patient Privacy: HIPAA Compliance in the Electronic Age