Low T/R Ratios in Type-1 Brugada Pattern May Predict VF, Sudden Cardiac Arrest

ECG, supraventricular extrasystole and short paroxysm of atrial fibrillation
ECG, supraventricular extrasystole and short paroxysm of atrial fibrillation
The risks for ventricular fibrillation or sudden cardiac arrest were found to be associated with low T/R ratios at leads II and V5 in patients with spontaneous type-1 Brugada pattern.

The risks for ventricular fibrillation (VF) or sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) were found to be associated with low T/R ratios at leads II and V5 in patients with spontaneous type-1 Brugada pattern (SBT1), according to a retrospective study published in the Journal of Electrocardiology.

Adults (N=115; 91.3% men) with SBT1 were recruited at 9 centers in France, 2 in Romania, and 2 in Switzerland to participate in this study. SBT1 was defined as ST-segment elevation ³2 mm in V1 and/or V2 with negative T waves in the absence of class I antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients underwent an electrophysiology study and their electrocardiogram data was digitized for analysis.

Of 115 participants, 45 (100% men; mean age, 38.7±11.5 years) had VF/SCA. Participants with vs without (n=70; mean age, 49.3±12.0 years) VF/SCA  had significantly different rates of: syncope (76.5% vs 24.2%, respectively; P <.001), heart rate (80.0 vs 70.3 beats per minute, respectively; P <.001), median QRS in lead V2 (122.0 vs 108.0, respectively; P =.001), mean wide QRS in lead V2 (30% vs 22%, respectively; P =.002), Bazett QTc in lead II (413.0 vs 389.5, respectively; P <.001), Fredericia QTc in lead II (393.0 vs 381.0, respectively; P =.004), maximum Tpeak-Tend interval (98.6 vs 85.5, respectively; P <.001), early repolarization (20% vs 45%, respectively; P <.001), and BT1 in peripheral leads (12% vs 1%, respectively; P =.004).

Patients with vs without VF/SCA had: higher median R wave amplitudes in lead V5 (1.43 vs 1.13 mV, respectively; P =.03), lower T/R ratios in lead V5 (0.25 vs 0.34, respectively; P =.008), lower T/R ratios in lead II (0.41 vs 0.51; P =.04, respectively), and lower T/R ratios among leads II and V5 (0.24 vs 0.43, respectively; P =.006).

The lowest T/R ratio was observed at leads II and V5 (£0.17) in 44.4% and 11.4% of patients with and without VF/SCA, respectively (P <.001). This value corresponded to the best cutoff for patient stratification (area under the curve, 0.65; specificity, 88.6%; sensitivity, 44.4%; positive predictive value, 71.4%; negative predictive value, 71.3%).

Independent predictors of VF/SCA were: minimum T/R ratio £0.17 (odds ratio [OR], 6.10; 95% CI, 1.92-19.40; P =.002), early repolarization (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.22-10.64; P =.02), and BT1 pattern in a peripheral lead (OR, 10.78; 95% CI, 1.21-96.13; P =.03).

A major limitation of this study was the fact that all assessments and correlations with overall disease state were determined from a single electrocardiograph.

The study authors concluded that low T/R ratio among leads II and V5 was an independent predictor of VF and/or SCA among patients with SBT1 pattern and may be a valuable tool for risk stratification, especially when combined with an early repolarization phenotype.

Reference

Delinière A, Baranchuk A, Bessière F, et al. Prognostic significance of a low T/R ratio in Brugada syndrome. J Electrocardiol. 2020;63:6-11. doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.08.023